Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 28.06.2025 06:27
Let’s just make it real clear:
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Epic Effort to Ground Physics in Math Opens Up the Secrets of Time - Quanta Magazine
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Why do some people enjoy being dominated?
Russia can stop this any time.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
U.C. Berkeley's Tiny Pogo Robot has a Unique Locomotion Style - Core77
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Thank you.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Why do some people believe that Homelander would be no match for Superman or Thor?
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
How Amazon’s Nuclear Deal Could Solve a Touchy Political Problem - Barron's
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
What’s next?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
How can someone feel more FTM when AMAB?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
No One in the Movies Stays Dead Anymore - Yahoo
Just in the last 5 years:
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Do you think the constitution and laws should be taught in school?